Constructing an analysis method for urban collective identities

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32870/rvcs.v0i7.122

Keywords:

collective identity, collective memory, sense of belonging, shared symbols and city

Abstract

Despite the movement of collective identities, societies maintain cultural elements linked to belonging and, in general, to their own characterization as collectives and individuals. In cities, identities deserve an analysis focused not only on the urban scaffolding but in a much more complex structure that delves into the daily collective life of the modern world. It is in this sense that ethnographic research proposes new methodological approaches for the treatment of identities, especially in the continuous socio-spatial reconfigurations where the inhabitants construct particular perceptions of the city, but at the same time shared and replicated in a spatial and temporal period. More dynamic than ever. The proposal focuses not only on conceptual development but also on methodological structuring through elements such as categories, indicators, observables, sources, and tools with which urban sociology can be treated. Consequently, the work leads to retake dimensional aspects of the object of study proposing a common scenario, which could undoubtedly be adjusted according to certain contexts and potential characteristics of urbanization. The purpose of the presentation is directed towards a continuous collaboration on the structural contents of the methodological treatment for collective identities, taking theoretical references of the collective identity as constructions that de ne societies with respect to others and that at the same time and a variation between their agglomerates (Gimenez, 2008).

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Diego Nápoles Franco, University of Guadalajara, Mexico

Research Professor at the University of Guadalajara. University Center of Social Sciences and Humanities, Doctor in City, Territory, and Sustainability. The University of Guadalajara, research areas: Urban Sociology. He has certifications in teacher training and foreign languages ​​from the Jyväskylä University in Finland (Teaching Through English in Higher Education) and the University of Cambridge (English Language Assessment). Graduated from the 7th generation of the leadership and innovation seminar in higher education from Harvard University, Boston College, Babson College, and Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT).

References

Bauman, Z. (2001). Globalización. Consecuencias humanas. México, df: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

--- (2003). Modernidad líquida. México, DF: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Berger, P. y L. Thomas (1968). La construcción social de la realidad. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.

Brubaker, R. (2002). "Ethnicity without Groups". Archives Europeénnes de Sociologie, t. XLIII, núm. 2: 163-189.

https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975602001066

Castells, M. (1999). La cuestión urbana. Barcelona, España: Siglo XXI.

--- (2012). Comunicación y poder. México DF: Siglo XXI.

Casado, J. y M. Sánchez (2013). "Coatzacoalcos: Reestructuración urbana e inversión privada en una ciudad media mexicana". eure, vol. 39,núm. 117, mayo: 91-116. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.cl/pdf/eure/v39n117/art05.pdf. Consultado: 9 de febrero de 2018.

https://doi.org/10.4067/S0250-71612013000200005

García, N. (2014). Imaged Globalization. USA: Duke University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822378891

Giménez, G. (1996). "Territorio y cultura". Estudios sobre las Culturas Contemporáneas, vol. II, núm. 4. Universidad de Colima, pp. 9-30. Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/pdf/316/31600402.pdf. Consultado: 8 de febrero de 2017

--- (1997). "Materiales para una teoría de las identidades sociales". Frontera Norte, vol. 9, núm. 18. Colegio de la Frontera Norte, pp. 1-25. Disponible en: https://fronteranorte.colef. mx/index.php/fronteranorte/article/viewFile/1441/891. Consultado: 20 de marzo de 20

--- (2008). "Cultura, identidad y memoria. Materiales para una sociología de los procesos culturales en las franjas fronterizas". Frontera Norte, vol. 21, núm. 41. Colegio de la Frontera Norte, pp. 1-25. Disponible en: https://fronteranorte.colef.mx/index.php/fronteranorte/article/view/972/449. Consultado: 20 de marzo de 2017.

Harvey, D. (2010). El enigma del capital y la crisis del capitalismo. México df: Akal.

Nápoles, D. (2014). "Generando identidades colectivas en espacios urbanos reconfigurados". Anduli, núm. 13: 151-163. Disponible en: http://institucional.us.es/revistas/anduli/13/9_Anduli_2014_Napoles.pdf. Consultado: 20 de julio de 2018.

https://doi.org/10.12795/anduli.2014.i13.09

Retamozo, M. (2012) "Constructivismo: epistemología y metodología en las ciencias sociales". En: Enrique de la Garza Toledo y Gustavo Leyva (Ed.). Tratado de metodología de las ciencias sociales: perspectivas actuales. México, df: Fondo de Cultura Económica, pp. 373-396.

Rodríguez, G.; Flores, J. y E. García (1999). Metodología de la investigación cualitativa. España: Aljibe

Tapia, A. (2009). "Algunos geosímbolos de Baja California. Identidad y memoria colectiva de la ruralidad". Culturales, vol. 5, núm. 10.

España. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1870-11912009000200006. Consultado: 7 de febrero de 2016.

Tuan, Y. (1974). Topophilia. A Study of Environmental Perception, Attitude and Values. New Jersey, USA: Prentice Hall.

Vivar, F. (2002). Primeras señas de identidad colectiva: las alabanzas de España medievales. Castilla, 27, pp. 141-158. Disponible en: http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=1091297.Consultado: 10 de marzo de 2017

Published

2020-01-31

How to Cite

Nápoles Franco, D. (2020). Constructing an analysis method for urban collective identities. Vivienda Y Comunidades Sustentables, (7), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.32870/rvcs.v0i7.122