Constructing an analysis method for urban collective identities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32870/rvcs.v0i7.122Keywords:
collective identity, collective memory, sense of belonging, shared symbols and cityAbstract
Despite the movement of collective identities, societies maintain cultural elements linked to belonging and, in general, to their own characterization as collectives and individuals. In cities, identities deserve an analysis focused not only on the urban scaffolding but in a much more complex structure that delves into the daily collective life of the modern world. It is in this sense that ethnographic research proposes new methodological approaches for the treatment of identities, especially in the continuous socio-spatial reconfigurations where the inhabitants construct particular perceptions of the city, but at the same time shared and replicated in a spatial and temporal period. More dynamic than ever. The proposal focuses not only on conceptual development but also on methodological structuring through elements such as categories, indicators, observables, sources, and tools with which urban sociology can be treated. Consequently, the work leads to retake dimensional aspects of the object of study proposing a common scenario, which could undoubtedly be adjusted according to certain contexts and potential characteristics of urbanization. The purpose of the presentation is directed towards a continuous collaboration on the structural contents of the methodological treatment for collective identities, taking theoretical references of the collective identity as constructions that de ne societies with respect to others and that at the same time and a variation between their agglomerates (Gimenez, 2008).Metrics
References
Bauman, Z. (2001). Globalización. Consecuencias humanas. México, df: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
--- (2003). Modernidad líquida. México, DF: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Berger, P. y L. Thomas (1968). La construcción social de la realidad. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.
Brubaker, R. (2002). "Ethnicity without Groups". Archives Europeénnes de Sociologie, t. XLIII, núm. 2: 163-189.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975602001066
Castells, M. (1999). La cuestión urbana. Barcelona, España: Siglo XXI.
--- (2012). Comunicación y poder. México DF: Siglo XXI.
Casado, J. y M. Sánchez (2013). "Coatzacoalcos: Reestructuración urbana e inversión privada en una ciudad media mexicana". eure, vol. 39,núm. 117, mayo: 91-116. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.cl/pdf/eure/v39n117/art05.pdf. Consultado: 9 de febrero de 2018.
https://doi.org/10.4067/S0250-71612013000200005
García, N. (2014). Imaged Globalization. USA: Duke University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822378891
Giménez, G. (1996). "Territorio y cultura". Estudios sobre las Culturas Contemporáneas, vol. II, núm. 4. Universidad de Colima, pp. 9-30. Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/pdf/316/31600402.pdf. Consultado: 8 de febrero de 2017
--- (1997). "Materiales para una teoría de las identidades sociales". Frontera Norte, vol. 9, núm. 18. Colegio de la Frontera Norte, pp. 1-25. Disponible en: https://fronteranorte.colef. mx/index.php/fronteranorte/article/viewFile/1441/891. Consultado: 20 de marzo de 20
--- (2008). "Cultura, identidad y memoria. Materiales para una sociología de los procesos culturales en las franjas fronterizas". Frontera Norte, vol. 21, núm. 41. Colegio de la Frontera Norte, pp. 1-25. Disponible en: https://fronteranorte.colef.mx/index.php/fronteranorte/article/view/972/449. Consultado: 20 de marzo de 2017.
Harvey, D. (2010). El enigma del capital y la crisis del capitalismo. México df: Akal.
Nápoles, D. (2014). "Generando identidades colectivas en espacios urbanos reconfigurados". Anduli, núm. 13: 151-163. Disponible en: http://institucional.us.es/revistas/anduli/13/9_Anduli_2014_Napoles.pdf. Consultado: 20 de julio de 2018.
https://doi.org/10.12795/anduli.2014.i13.09
Retamozo, M. (2012) "Constructivismo: epistemología y metodología en las ciencias sociales". En: Enrique de la Garza Toledo y Gustavo Leyva (Ed.). Tratado de metodología de las ciencias sociales: perspectivas actuales. México, df: Fondo de Cultura Económica, pp. 373-396.
Rodríguez, G.; Flores, J. y E. García (1999). Metodología de la investigación cualitativa. España: Aljibe
Tapia, A. (2009). "Algunos geosímbolos de Baja California. Identidad y memoria colectiva de la ruralidad". Culturales, vol. 5, núm. 10.
España. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1870-11912009000200006. Consultado: 7 de febrero de 2016.
Tuan, Y. (1974). Topophilia. A Study of Environmental Perception, Attitude and Values. New Jersey, USA: Prentice Hall.
Vivar, F. (2002). Primeras señas de identidad colectiva: las alabanzas de España medievales. Castilla, 27, pp. 141-158. Disponible en: http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=1091297.Consultado: 10 de marzo de 2017
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Vivienda y Comunidades Sustentables
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:
In accordance with the copyright legislation, Sustainable Housing and Communities recognizes and respects the moral right of the authors, as well as the ownership of the patrimonial right, which will be transferred to the University of Guadalajara for its dissemination in open access. Sustainable Housing and Communities does not charge authors for submitting and processing articles for publication. Authors may make other independent and additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in Sustainable Housing and Communities (for example, include it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book) as long as they clearly indicate that the work is published for the first time in Sustainable Housing and Communities.