Interstitial spaces: their functionality and connectivity with the city

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32870/rvcs.v0i14.255

Keywords:

Urban interstice, Socio-spatial relationships, Habitability, Functionality, Connectivity

Abstract

The accelerated growth of cities has left in its wake the formation of interstices in the peripheries, spaces characterized by the lack of attention, evidenced in their conditions of deterioration and contamination, a fact that has repercussions on the type of use given to them. In this sense, the aim of the study is to analyze the type of socio-spatial relations required in the interstice between the neighborhood and the city; in which a mixed methods approach was implemented based on the application of a perception questionnaire and a field record, which considered socio-spatial relations, functionality and connectivity as variables. The research was carried out during the period from August 2021 to December 2022, in the interstices adjacent to the Los Encinos neighborhood, located in Ensenada, Baja California, Mexico. The results showed differences in the functionality of the interstice based on physical and visual permeability and proximity to infrastructure and equipment. In this sense, it was shown that the connectivity of the environment conditions the use of interstitial spaces and weakens their socio-spatial relations. The contribution of this paper focused on showing that these spaces, commonly characterized in various studies as having little or no use, do present appropriations: ephemeral or long-lasting, which is limited to the perceived conditions of connectivity and security.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Lizeth Guadalupe Félix Lugo, Autonomous University of Baja California, Mexico

Bachelor of Architecture, Student of a Master's Degree in Architecture, Urbanism and Design (MyDAUD), from the Faculty of Engineering, Architecture and Design (FIAD), of the Autonomous University of Baja California (UABC). She focused on urban issues and socio-spatial relationships.

Mariel Organista Camacho, Autonomous University of Baja California, Mexico

PhD in Habitat Sciences from the inter-institutional Program in Habitat Sciences at the UASLP/UADY. Full-time Professor-Researcher at the Faculty of Engineering, Architecture and Design (FIAD) of the Autonomous University of Baja California, professor of the Master's and Doctoral Program in Architecture, Urbanism and Design (MyDAUD). Member of the National System of Researchers, Candidate. Desirable profile of the Academic Performance Recognition Program (PREDEPA) (2021-2024). Member of the Academic Body UABC-CA-333: Architecture, City and Landscape. Member of the university technical council. President of the Academic Subcommittee by Field of Knowledge (SACC) of Line 2. Urbanism and Landscape of MyDAUD. She is currently directing Master's and PhD theses in the MyDAUD program. In the professional field, she belongs to the College of Professional Architects of Ensenada (CAPE). Her topics of interest are habitability, social interest housing, socio-spatial relations, public space and ways of living.

References

Águila Flores, J. L. (2014). Espacio intersticial. Surgimiento y transformación. Caso: Tonalá, Jalisco en México. Universidad Internacional de Andalucía.

Albero, D. (2021). Under the Bridge: estudio autoarqueoetnográfico de un espacio intersticial en la Mallorca supermoderna. Complutum, 32(1), 191–215. Disponible en: https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org//cmpl.76454

Alzahrani, A., Borsi, K. y Jarman, D. (2017). Place-making and its Implications for Social Value: A Comparison Study of Two Urban Squares in London. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 12(4), 752–762. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP- V12-N4-752-762

Barton, J. y Pretty, J. (2010). What is the Best Dose of Nature and Green Exercise for Improving Mental Health? A Multi-study Analysis. Environmental Science and Technology, 44(10), 3947–3955. Disponible en: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1021/es903183r

Bennett, A. F. (1999). Linkages in the Landscape: The Role of Corridors and Connectivity in Wildlife Conservation. IUCN, Gland, Switzer- land and Cambridge, UK.

Berruete, F. J. (2017). Los vacíos urbanos: una nueva definición. Urbano, 35, 114–122. Disponible en: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22320/07813 607.2017.20.35.09

Browning, C., Calder, C., Soller, B., Jackson, A. y Dir- lam, J. (2017). Ecological Networks and Neighborhood Social Organization. American Journal of Sociology, 122(6), 1939–1988. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1086/691261

Carmona, M., Heath, T.,Oc, T. y Tiesdell, S. (2003). Public Places - Urban Spaces, vol. 2. Routledge. Disponible en: https://doi.org/https://doi. org /10.4324 /9780080515427

Cerda, J. y Marmolejo, C. (2010). De la accesibili- dad a la funcionalidad del territorio: Una nueva dimensión para entender la estructura urbano-residencial de las áreas metropolitanas de Santiago (Chile) y Barcelona (España). Revista

de Geografía Norte Grande, 46, 5–27.

Checa, J. y Nel·lo, O. (2021). Residential Segregation and Living Conditions. An Analysis of Social In-equalities in Catalonia from Four Spatial Perspectives. Urban Science, 5(2), 45. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci5020045

De Lima, C. H. (2014). A cidade insurgente: Estratégias dos coletivos urbanos e vida pública. Arquiteturarevista, 10(1), 31–36. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.4013/arq.2014.101.04

Drobnik, T., Schwaab, J. y Grêt-Regamey, A. (2020). Moving towards Integrating Soil into Spatial Planning: No Net Loss of Soil-based Ecosystem Services. Journal of Environmental Management, 263, 1–13. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110406

Dubeaux, S. y Cunningham, E. (2018). Maximizing the Potential of Vacant Spaces within Shrin- king Cities, a German Approach. Cities, 75, 6–11. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.06.015

Eissa, D., Hassan, M., Gabr, A. y Abdelghaffar, A.

(2019). From Appropriation to formal Intervention: An Analytical Framework for Understanding the appropriation Process in Residual Spaces of Cairo. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 8(2), 201–214. Disponible en: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.foar.2019.03.004

Espósito, F. y Senna, A. (2020). Arquitetura efêmera e insurgência urbana. Estratégias de apro- priação do comércio ambulante nos espaços intersticiais do BRT TransOeste, Rio de Janeiro. Arquitecturas del Sur, 38(57), 108–127. Disponi- ble en: https://doi.org/10.22320/07196466.2020 .38.057.06

Fernández-Gómez, M. (2019). Propuesta metodológica para el estudio de intersticios urbanos y su potencial uso como espacio público. Legado de Arquitectura y Diseño, 26, 37–59.

Forero, L. A. (2015). Intersticios urbanos ambientales, elementos articuladores desde el espacio público. Caso río Fucha tramo Carrera 10° - Carrera 30 Pontificia Universidad Javeriana. Disponible en: https://doi.org/https://doi. org /10.11144 /Javeriana.10554.15557

Forman, R. T. T. y Godron, M. (1981). Patches and Structural Components For A Landscape Ecology. BioScience, 31(10), 733–740. Disponible en: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/1308780

Gandy, M. (2016). Unintentional Landscapes. Landscape Research, 41(4), 433–440. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2016.1156069

García, T. (2017). La táctica urbana en el intersticio como articuladora de ciudad. Trienal de Investigación FAU, 1–13. Disponible en: http://trienal. fau.ucv.ve

Gómez, M. H. (2000). La relación social como ca- tegoría de las ciencias sociales. Reis, 90, 37–77. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.2307/40184251

Hernández, M. (2012). Habitar lo público: estrate- gias artísticas para la mejora de la funcionali- dad y el uso ciudadano de los espacios públicos urbanos. aacaDigital: Revista de La Asociación Aragonesa de Críticos de Arte, 18, 1–7. Disponible en: http://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/arti- culo/3927775.pdf%5Cnhttp://dialnet.unirioja. es/servlet/extart?codigo=3927775

Hernández, M. (2012). Habitar lo público: estrate- gias artísticas para la mejora de la funcionali- dad y el uso ciudadano de los espacios públicos urbanos. aacaDigital: Revista de La Asociación Aragonesa de Críticos de Arte, 18, 1–7. Disponible en: http://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/arti- culo/3927775.pdf%5Cnhttp://dialnet.unirioja. es/servlet/extart?codigo=3927775

Kelleher, W. (2022). Interstitial Small Stories in Sandton, Gauteng, South Africa. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics Plus, 64, 49–77. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.5842/64-1-853

Lane, R., J. Powell, T., Zhang, Z., Qian, C., Bian, Y., Banco de Desarrollo de América Lati- na, Yao, Y., Zhang, Y., Tian, L., Zhou, N., Li, Z. y Wang, M. (2019). Cities With Atributes: Connectivity, Accesibility and Mobility. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(19), 2020. Disponible en: https://publications.iadb.org/ publications/spanish/document/Ciclo-inclu- sión-en-América-Latina-y-el-Caribe-Guía-pa- ra-impulsar-el-uso-de-la-bicicleta.pdf%0Ah- ttp://euroclimaplus.org/movilidadurbana/ item/227-guatemala-triciclos-electricos

Leal del Castillo, G. (2010). Ecourbanismo, ciudad, medio ambiente y sostenibilidad, 2a ed. Ecoe Ediciones.

Lefebvre, H. (1974). La producción del espacio. En Capitán Swing Libros. Disponible en: https:// doi.org /10.2307/j.ctt201mp2s.7

Lombard, M. (2014). Constructing Ordinary Places: Place-making in Urban Informal Settlements in Mexico. Progress in Planning, 94, 1–53. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. progress.2013.05.003

López-Pineiro, S. (2020). The Limit toward Emptiness: Urban Voids as Public Space. Landscape Architecture Frontiers, 8(5), 120–129. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.15302/j-laf-1-030020

López, M. J. y Faginas, V. L. (2019). El espacio pú- blico como elemento de cohesión territorial. Rev. Turismo y Sociedad, XXV, 131–149. Disponible en: https://doi.org/https://doi. org/10.18601/01207555.n25.07

Mora Guerra, V. (2019). Intersticios urbanos como articuladores del territorio fragmentado, Cucuta - Río Pamplonita - La Gazapa. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana. Disponible en: http:// hdl.handle.net/10554 /46365

Osorio, A. (2020). Estación de transporte en un espacio intersticio productor de desarrollo urbano. Universidad Piloto de Colombia. En Universidad Piloto de Colombia. Disponible en: http://repository.unipiloto.edu.co/hand- le/20.500.12277/9835

Páramo, P., Burbano, A., Jiménez-Domínguez, B., Barrios, V., Pasquali, C., Vivas, F., Moros, O., Alzate, M., Jaramillo Fayad, J. C. y Moyano, E. (2018). La habitabilidad del espacio público en las ciudades de América Latina. Avances en Psicología Latinoamericana, 36(2), 345–362. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/apl/a.4874

Peimbert, A. (2008). Paisaje intersticial. Mexicali: de la entropía al vacío. Tesis de maestría, Uni- versidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Repositorio de la UNAM.

Phelps, N. y Silva, C. (2018). Mind the gaps! A Research Agenda for Urban Interstices. Urban Studies, 55(6), 1–42. Disponible en: https://doi. org/10.1177/0042098017732714

Quiroz-Jiménez, J. (2017). Sociedad y espacio en la calzada de Guadalupe. El Jardín Colón en San Luís de Potosí. Bitácora Urbano-Territorial, 3(27), 19–28.

Rozas, P. y Figueroa, O. (2006). Conectividad, ámbitos de impacto y desarrollo territorial: análisis de experiencias internacionales. In Naciones Unidas, vol. 1. Disponible en: http:// www.eclac.org/publicaciones/xml/9/19539/ lcl2169e.pdf%5Cnhttp://books.google.com/ books?hl=en&lr=&id=ZqbCX-p1y4AC&oi=fn- d&pg=PA1&dq=Conectividad,+ámbitos+y+- desarrollo+territorial:+análsis+de+experiencias+internacioanles&ots=KuqiqHMHHp&si-g=4LFjKGzg2Ozy

Salazar, M. (2021). Infraestructura social para

la articulación de un intersticio urbano del sector v con la dinámica de Chiclayo. Disponible en: https://tesis.usat.edu.pe/hand- le/20.500.12423 /3489

Saura, S., Bodin, Ö. y Fortin, M. J. (2014). Stepping Stones are Crucial for Species’ Long-distance Dispersal and Range Expansion through Habitat Networks. Journal of Applied Ecology, 51(1), 171–182. Disponible en: https://doi. org /10.1111 /1365-2664.12179

Saura, S. y Pascual-Hortal, L. (2007). A New Habitat Availability Index to Integrate Connectivity in Landscape Conservation Planning: Comparison with Existing Indices and Application to a Case Study. Landscape and Urban Planning, 83(2–3), 91–103. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. landurbplan.2007.03.005

Silva, C. y Ma, J. (2021). A Sustainable Urban Sprawl? The Environmental Values of Suburban Interstitial Spaces of Santiago de Chile. DisP - The Planning Review, 57(3), 50–67. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2021.2026667

Tamayo, S., y Wildner, K. (2004). Identidades urba- nas (1a). Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana.

Troitskaya, A. A. (2020). Marking a Place: The Role of Void Spaces in the mental Boundaries of a City (on the example of the smolenka river mouth). Journal of Frontier Studies, 4, 344–381. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.46539/jfs. v5i4.243

Tudela Salazar, C. (2017). Funcionalidad territorial: Niveles de accesibilidad de la población a equipamientos de salud primaria en la comuna de Pudahuel. Universidad de Chile.

Villarroel Jiménez, A. (2011). El espacio público como medio modelador para la reconfiguración del espacio intersticial: territorios intersticiales en micro-ciudades urbano-rurales. Disponible en: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12536/197

Wei, F. y Huang, Z. (2020). Physical Experience and Space-Time Imagery- Research on the Proto-type of Landscape Design by Understanding Site, Sight, and Insight. Landscape Architecture Frontiers, 8(4), 26–41. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.15302/j-laf-1-020031

Wickes, R., Zahnow, R., Corcoran, J. y Hipp, J. R. (2019). Neighbourhood Social Conduits and Resident Social Cohesion. Urban Studies, 56(1), 226–248. Disponible en: https://doi. org/10.1177/0042098018780617

Published

2023-07-31

How to Cite

Félix Lugo, L. G., & Organista Camacho, M. (2023). Interstitial spaces: their functionality and connectivity with the city. Vivienda Y Comunidades Sustentables, (14), 21–41. https://doi.org/10.32870/rvcs.v0i14.255