Public Green Sapce Need Index in the municipality of Guadalajara 2018-2021
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32870/rvcs.v0i17.294Keywords:
Desigualdad socio espacial, Espacios públicos, Índice, Políticas públicas localesAbstract
The objective of this paper is to develop a tool to diagnose the need for public green spaces in the municipality of Guadalajara, and to analyze the socio-spatial congruence of the different municipal actions regarding the creation and improvement of such spaces. For this purpose, a quantitative methodology was implemented to develop an index with the support of Geographic Information Systems, incorporating the variables of population density, density of public green spaces and socioeconomic level; subsequently, a geolocalized inventory of the actions of the Pocket Parks and 100 Parks programs was carried out. A qualitative section based on interviews with public officials is also included in order to learn about the management and decision-making processes regarding the location of the actions of these programs. The results show the socio-spatial inequality in the distribution of public green spaces, the degree of congruence that the actions of these programs had, and the logic of decision making in this regard, noting the potential of pocket parks to improve access to these spaces in marginalized neighborhoods. The scope of this study is at the municipal level during the 2028-2021 administration, and only involves two programs; however, its value lies in putting on the table the relevance of seeking spatial justice criteria in decision-making regarding public green spaces, which are essential for the sustainable development of our cities.Metrics
References
Aceves, J., De la Torre, R. y Safa, P. (2004). Fragmentos urbanos de una misma ciudad: Guadalajara. Espiral Estudios sobre Estado y sociedad, 11(31), 277–320. https://doi.org/10.32870/eees.v11i31.1566
Bendimo-Rung, A. L., Mowen, A. J. y Cohen, D. A. (2005). The significance of parks to physical activity and public health: A conceptual model. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28(2), 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.024
Bengochea, A. (2003). A hedonic valuation of urban green areas. Landscape and Urban Planning, 66(1), 35–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00093-8
Borja, J. (2000). Ciudadanía y espacio público. En D. Jiménez (Ed.), Laberintos urbanos en América Latina (p. 9–34). Ediciones ABYA-YALA. https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1163&context=abya_yala
Bourdin, A. (2007). L’action publique de proximité dans la métropole des individus.
Carmona, M. (2010). Contemporary public space : Critique and classification, part one : Critique. Journal of Urban Design, 15(1), 123–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574800903435651
Cohen, D. A., McKenzie, T. L., Sehgal, A., Williamson, S., Golinelli, D. y Lurie, N. (2007). Contribution of public parks to physical activity. American Journal of Public Health, 97(3), 509–514. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2005.072447
Cruz-Sandoval, M., Ortego, M. I., y Roca, E. (2020). Tree ecosystem services, for everyone? A compositional analysis approach to assess the distribution of urban trees as an indicator of environmental justice. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12031215
Fausto-Brito, A. (2015). De asentamientos informales a colonias populares consolidadas. En E. R. Jiménez-Huerta y H. Cruz-Solís (Eds.), Colonias populares consolidadas del área metropolitana de Guadalajara. Retos y oportunidades (p. 44–71). Universidad de Guadalajara. http://cucea.udg.mx/include/publicaciones/coorinv/pdf/Colonias_populares_x1a_color.pdf
Fernández-Álvarez, R. (2017). Inequitable distribution of green public space in the Mexico City: an environmental injustice case. Economía, Sociedad y Territorio, XVII(54), 399-428. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/111/11150592006.pdf
Garrocho, C. F., y Campos Alanís, J. (2006). Un indicador de accesibilidad a unidades de servicio clave para ciudades mexicanas: fundamentos, diseño y aplicación. Economía Sociedad y Territorio, VI(22), 349–97.
Gehl, J. (2014). Ciudades para la gente. Editorial Infinito.
Gilbert, A. (1994). The Latin American City. LAB.
Goodsell, C. T. (2003). The concept of public space and its democratic manifestations. American Review of Public Administration, 33(4), 361–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074003254469
Gottsbacher, M., y Erazo, J. (2016). Introducción. En, Carrión, F., y Erazo, J., (Coords), El derecho a la ciudad en América Latina. Visiones desde la política (p. 9-20). Uiversidad Nacional Autónoma de México. https://www.puec.unam.mx/pdf/libros_digitales/el_derecho_a_la_ciudad_digital.pdf
Guadalajara entrega el cuarto “parque de bolsillo”. (2010, 17 de junio). El Informador. https://www.informador.mx/Jalisco/Guadalajara-entrega-el-cuarto-parque-de-bolsillo-20100617-0068.html
Guillén, A., Sáenz, K., Mohammad, B y Castillo, J. (2009). Origen, espacio y niveles de participación ciudadana. International Journal of Good Conscience IV (1), 179–93. http://www.spentamexico.org/v4-n1/4%281%29%20179-193.pdf
Hardin, G. (1968). The Tragedy of the Commons.
Hoehner, C. M., Brennan Ramirez, L. K., Elliott, M. B., Handy, S. L. y Brownson, R. C. (2005). Perceived and objective environmental measures and physical activity among urban adults. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28(2), 105–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.023
Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities.
Kuo, F. E., Sullivan, W. C., Coley, R. L. y Brunson, L. (1998). Fertile Ground for Community: Inner-City Neighborhood Common Spaces. American Journal of Community Psicology, 26(6), 823–851. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022294028903
Kweon, B. S., Sullivan, W. C. y Wiley, A. R. (1998). Green common spaces and the social integration of inner-city older adults. Environment and Behavior, 30(6), 832–858. https://doi.org/10.1177/001391659803000605
Ley General de Asentamientos Humanos. (2016, noviembre 28). Diario Oficial de la Federación. México. http://www.diputados.gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/pdf/LGAHOTDU_011220.pdf
Low, S. y Smith, N. (2006.). The Politics of Public Space. Routledge.
Ma, B., Zhou, T., Lei, S., Wen, Y. y Htun, T. T. (2019). Effects of urban green spaces on residents wellbeing. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 21(6), 2793–2809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-018-0161-8
Martí, M., Blanco, I. y Parés, M. (2011). Regeneración urbana y gobernanza. 27–52.
Mitchell, D. 2003. The Right to the City: Social Justice and the Fight for Public Space. Guildford Press.
Muñoz Reséndiz, M. Q. (2014). Accesibilidad a las áreas verdes urbanas como espacios públicos. El caso de Ciudad Juárez, Chihuahua [Tesis de maestría, El Colegio de la Frontera Norte]. https://www.colef.mx/posgrado/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/TESIS-Mu%C3%B1oz-Resendiz-Mara-Quetzalli.pdf
Norma Oficial Mexicana PROY-NOM-001-SEDATU-2021, Espacios públicos en los asentamientos humanos (2022, febrero 22). Diario Oficial de la Federación. México. https://www.dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=5643417&fecha=22/02/2022#gsc.tab=0
Nowak, D., Dwyer, J.F. y Childs, G. (1997). Los beneficios y costos del enverdecimiento urbano. En Krishnamurthy, L. y Nascimento, J.R. (Eds). Áreas Verdes Urbanas en Latinoamérica y el Caribe. 17-38.
Organización de las Naciones Unidas (2015). Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/es/cities/
Organización de las Naciones Unidas (2017). Nueva Agenda Urbana. https://habitat3.org/wp-content/uploads/NUA-Spanish.pdf
Pradilla E., (2016) Las transformaciones de los conflictos y los movimientos sociales en las ciudades latinoamericanas. En Carrión, F. y Erazo, J. (Coord), El derecho a la ciudad en América Latina. Visiones desde la política (pp. 157–172). UNAM, México. https://www.puec.unam.mx/pdf/libros_digitales/el_derecho_a_la_ciudad_digital.pdf
Ramírez Kuri, P. (2007). La ciudad, espacio de construcción de ciudadanía. Enfoques: Ciencias Políticas y Administración Pública, (7), 85–107.
Ramírez Kuri, P. (2015). Espacio público, ¿espacio de todos? Reflexiones desde la ciudad de México. Revista mexicana de sociología, 77(1), 7–36. https://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/rms/v77n1/v77n1a1.pdf
Remme, R. P., Frumkin, H., Guerry, A. D., King, A. C., Mandle, L., Sarabu, C., Bratman, G. N., Giles-Corti, B., Hamel, P., Han, B., Hicks, J. L., James, P., Lawler, J. J., Lindahl, T., Liu, H., Lu, Y., Oosterbroek, B., Paudel, B., Sallis, J. F., ... Daily, G. C. (2021). An ecosystem service perspective on urban nature, physical activity, and health. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118(22), https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2018472118
Reyes Plata, J. y Bolea, C. G. (2018). Distribución de las áreas verdes, índice de marginación y justicia ambiental en León, Guanajuato. En Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México y Asociación Mexicana de Ciencias para el Desarrollo Regional A.C. (Eds.), Desarrollo Regional Sustentable y Turismo (pp. 177–203). http://ru.iiec.unam.mx/3781/
Ruiz Velazco Castañeda, A. H. (2005). Desigualdad Socioespacial y Segregación en Guadalajara. Geocalli, 6(12).
Soja, E. W. (2010). Seeking Spatial Justice. University of Minnesota Press.
Subirats, J. (2016) Políticas urbanas e innovación social. Entre la coproducción y la nueva institucionalidad. En Carrión, F. y Erazo, J, (Coords.), El derecho a la ciudad en América Latina. Visiones desde la política (pp. 49–71). UNAM, México. https://www.puec.unam.mx/pdf/libros_digitales/el_derecho_a_la_ciudad_digital.pdf
Webster, C. (2007). Property rights, public space, and urban design. Town Planning Review, 78(1), 80–101. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.78.1.6
White, M. P., Pahl, S., Wheeler, B. W., Depledge, M. H. y Fleming, L. E. (2017). Natural environments and subjective wellbeing: Different types of exposure are associated with different aspects of wellbeing. Health and Place, 45(01). 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2017.03.008
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Vivienda y Comunidades Sustentables
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:
In accordance with the copyright legislation, Sustainable Housing and Communities recognizes and respects the moral right of the authors, as well as the ownership of the patrimonial right, which will be transferred to the University of Guadalajara for its dissemination in open access. Sustainable Housing and Communities does not charge authors for submitting and processing articles for publication. Authors may make other independent and additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in Sustainable Housing and Communities (for example, include it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book) as long as they clearly indicate that the work is published for the first time in Sustainable Housing and Communities.
