Antegration and analysis of co-benefits as an efficient as an projects strategy for the future of the city: policies, conflicts and opportunities

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32870/rvcs.v0i1.5

Keywords:

sustainability, co-benefits, city, policies, climate change

Abstract

Sustainability has been presented as an integra- tive strategy between the economic, social and environmental sectors in order to preserve vital resources. Today, a challenge detected for cities, is to be able to meet the objectives imposed through this concept. Among this challenge, it is important to highlight the problem associated with generating measures that serve a single sec- tor, and thus, the approach of various side e ects that come included in the process falls short. So, how is it possible to identify and integrate these collateral measures (co-benefits) from the various areas of intervention within the urban environment field, detonating these as potentialities for the e cient development of the city?

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Dulce Esmeralda García Ruiz, University of Guadalajara, Mexico

Doctor in City, Territory and Sustainability from the University of Guadalajara. Architect and Teacher from the Autonomous University of Guadalajara. 

References

Castillo, C. K., D. Cromwell Sanqui, M. Ajero, y C. Huizenga, (2007). The Co-Benefits of Responding to Climate Change: STATUS in ASIA. Manda luyong, Philippines, Asia: US EPA; MO; CAI Asia.

Economist Intelligence Unit, 2010. Índice de las ciudades verdes en América Latina. Munich: Siemens AG.

García, D. E. (2015). Co-beneficios en la vivienda sus tentable metropolitana. Guadalajara: II Congreso investigadoras del SNI.

López,V.L.(2014).Sustentabilidadydesarrollosus tentable: origen, precisiones conceptuales y metodología operativa . México: Trillas.

Balaban, O. (2013). Co-Benefits of Green Buildings and the Opportunities and Barriers Regarding their Promotion. UNU IAS; TUBITAK.

Bollen, et al. (2009) Co-benefits of climate change mitigation policies: literature review and new results. París: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

Foladori, G y N. Pierri (2005). Sustentabilidad Desacuerdo sobre el desarrollo sustentable. México: Universidad Aut noma de Zacatecas/Porra.

Garza Gutiérrez, E. y E. González Gaudino (2010).

De las teorías del desarrollo al desarrollo sustentable. México: UANL/ Siglo XXI.

IPCC. (2007). Climate Change 2007: Working Group

III: Mitigation of Climate Change. Recuperado el 22 de enero de 2017, de IPCC Fourth Assessment Report: Climate Change 2007: https://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg3/en/ch7s7 10 .html

IPCC, 2007: Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of

Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, M.L. Parry, O.F. Canziani, J.P. Paluti Kof, P.J. van der Linden and

C.E. Hanson (Eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 976pp.

Miyatsuka, A. y E. Zusman (s.f.). Fact Sheet No.1 What are Co-benefits? (ACP, Ed.) Recuperado el 22 de enero de 2017, de https://pub.iges.or. jp/system/les/publication_documents/pub/ nonpeer/2393/acp_factsheet_1_what_cobenefit s.pdf

Nascimento, Moreira, Hardt y Schussel, 2015. Analise de políticas públicas entre modelagem e a realidade da política habitacional brasileira . R o de Janeiro: Rev. Adm. Pública.

Olgyay, V. (2013). Arquitectura y clima Manual de diseño bioclimatico para arquitectos y urbanistas. Estados Unidos: Gustavo Gili.

Smith, A. (2013). The climate bonus. Co-benefit of Climate Policy. (Kindle, Ed.) Abingdon: Rout ledge y Earthscan. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203109571

Stern, N. (2006). Stern review on the economics of climate change. Reino Unido: Government of the United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511817434

Published

2017-08-16

How to Cite

García Ruiz, D. E. (2017). Antegration and analysis of co-benefits as an efficient as an projects strategy for the future of the city: policies, conflicts and opportunities. Vivienda Y Comunidades Sustentables, (1), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.32870/rvcs.v0i1.5