Uses of heritage in the historic city. The limits of restoration
Los límites de la restauración
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32870/rvcs.v0i13.238Keywords:
urban heritage, social construction, analytical categoriesAbstract
Heritage understood as a social construction, transcends the strictly material considerations concerning the built heritage. In the middle of the 20th century, as a result of the accelerated processes of urbanization, the place and function of the monument, valued as a unique object, changes and becomes urban heritage. The set of urban elements that surround it and their reciprocal relationships now participate in its heritage value. But also, their respective human environments participate, which are none other than the repositories of their symbolic meaning. As a process, heritage has been able to recognize the difficulty of its definition (in constant review) and its implications in the formulation of conservation strategies capable to estimate, in each case, the importance of the relationship between the inhabitants and their heritage. The article offers a brief description of a heritage building in ruins, whose selection has not been for its value of antiquity, but for the attractiveness of its current situation, which has been the subject of stimulating theoretical and critical reflection on the subject heritage and its conservation. Through an inductive process, a set of conceptual frameworks associated with the attributes and attributions that time has been able to grant to assets of heritage value is proposed, in order to establish the limits that, in some cases, restoration presents.Metrics
References
AmIrou, R. (2005). Tourisme et souci de l’autre. Hommage à Georges Cazes. París: L’Harmattan. Ascuasiati Dominguez, A. (2021). Espacios de la ciudad y manifestaciones culturales en la consol- idación de la identidad. Estudio de caso Bonyé. Tesis doctoral inédita. Centro Histórico de Santo Domingo.
Ballart, J. (1996). El valor del patrimonio histórico. Complutum Extra 6(II): 215-224.
Bujosa Mieses, J. (2016). Restauración Monasterio San Francisco excluido préstamo BID-Mitur. Ciudad Oriental.com. El periódico de Santo Domingo Este. Disponible en: https://ciudado- riental.com/excluyen-monasterio-san-francisco-prestamo/
Carrión, F (2005). El centro histórico como proyecto y objeto de deseo. EURE XXXI (93), agosto, pp. 89-100. Chile: Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile Santiago.
Casado Galván, I. (2009). Breve historia del concepto de patrimonio histórico: Del monumento al territorio. Contribuciones a las ciencias sociales. Recuperado en: www.eumed.net/rev/cccss/06/icg.htm
Delgadillo, V. (2015). Patrimonialización de la herencia colonial. Ciudades, núm. 107, pp. 8-15. Dormaels, M. (2012). Identidad, comunidades y patrimonio local: Una nueva legitimidad social. Alteridades, 22(43): 9-19.
García Canclini, N. (1999). Los usos sociales del patrimonio cultural. En Aguilar Criado, E., Nuevas perspectivas de estudio (pp. 16-33). Consejería de Cultura-Junta de Andalucía, Col. Cuadernos Patrimonio Etnológico.
Hernández de León, J. M. (2016). Ruinas y ausencias: ¿Cuáles son los límites de la restauración artística? El Confidencial. Disponible en: https://blogs.elconfidencial.com/cultura/tribuna/2016-05-20/ruinas-ausencias-restauracion-arquitectura_1202568/
Lévesque, L. (1999). Le terrain vague comme monument. Inter, núm. 72, pp. 27-30. Disponible en: https://www.erudit.org/fr/revues/in- ter/1999-n72-inter1104331/46248ac.pdf
llull Peñalba, J. (2005). Evolución del concepto y de la significación social del patrimonio cultural. Arte, Individuo y Sociedad, vol. 17, pp. 175-204.
Navarrete, D., y De la Torre, M. (2015). Patrones espaciales del delito en centralidades patri- moniales. Topofilia. Revista de Arquitectura, Urbanismo y Territorios, segunda época, vol. 1, pp. 219-230. Puebla: Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla. Disponible en: https:// www.academia.edu/36312420/patrones_espaciales_del_delito_en_centralidades_patrimoniales
Pizzorno, A. (2003). Por qué pagamos la nafta. Por una teoría del capital social. En A. Bagnasco, F. Piselli, A. Pizzorno y C. Trigilia, El capital social. Instrucciones de uso. México: FCE.
RIegl, A. (2003). Le culte moderne des monuments: sa nature, son origine, L’Harmattan. París.
Rosas Mantecón, A. (1998). Presentación. Alteridades, año 8, núm. 16, pp. 5-9.
Ruskin, John. (1849). Las siete lámparas de la arquitectura. (Trad. Manuel Crespo y Purificación Mayoral). México: Ediciones Coyoacán.
Veliz,M.(2015).LasruinasdeSanFrancisco,magia e irradiación. Touring. República Dominicana. Disponible en: https://www.touringdominican-republic.com/las-ruinas-de-san-francisco-magia-e-irradiacion/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Vivienda y Comunidades Sustentables
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:
In accordance with the copyright legislation, Sustainable Housing and Communities recognizes and respects the moral right of the authors, as well as the ownership of the patrimonial right, which will be transferred to the University of Guadalajara for its dissemination in open access. Sustainable Housing and Communities does not charge authors for submitting and processing articles for publication. Authors may make other independent and additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in Sustainable Housing and Communities (for example, include it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book) as long as they clearly indicate that the work is published for the first time in Sustainable Housing and Communities.
